Sunday, March 23, 2008
Saturday, March 22, 2008
The Most Incredibly Awesome Video of All Time, Ever
Jasmine? Jacaranda?

Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Monday, March 17, 2008
Term for the day
By lending massive amounts to potentially insolvent institutions that it does not supervise or regulate and that may be insolvent the Fed is taking serious financial risks and seriously exacerbate moral hazard distortions. Here you have highly leveraged non bank financial institutions that made reckless investments and lending, had extremely poor risk management and altogether disregarded liquidity risks; some may be insolvent but now the Fed is providing them with a blank check for unlimited amounts. This is a most radical action and a signal of how severe the crisis of the banking system and non-bank shadow financial system is. This is the worst US financial crisis since the Great Depression and the Fed is treating it as if it was only a liquidity crisis. But this is not just a liquidity crisis; it is rather a credit and insolvency crisis.
Useless stat of the day
hours and 40 minutes without a restart.
I have the sense that it was only about 5 years ago that I would have
to reboot my computer (hand-built XP desktop) every few days because
some misbehaving background task would get a little too close to the
operating system; of course, I was running professional compositing
software on it, but still, it really does feel like both XP and OS X
are far more stable operating environments these days than ever
before. (I have no experience running Vista.)
These days, pretty much the only reason I have to reboot is because
some software update requires it. (This is more true on the XP side
because I have to run virus and adware software in the background.)
Cudos, Mr. Gates and Mr. Jobs (and presumably Mr. Torvalds)!
Maybe I've watched too much Terminator
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Sunday, March 09, 2008
And another test.
- Bullet point 1
- Bullet point 2
- Number 1
- Number 2
Test post from my phone
Does this show up as paragraphs?
This?
--
John Portnoy
Sent from my mobile device. Please forgive any typos.
Friday, March 07, 2008
Exactly.
...[L]et's assume, for the sake of argument, that she actually believes that Barack Obama cannot "cross the commander-in-chief threshold." One of the most important jobs a President has is to defend the country. If she thinks that Barack Obama is not qualified to do that job, then she should not support him over anyone who can. Specifically, she should support McCain over Obama.
That's why I think some enterprising reporter should ask her whether she would support Barack Obama if he were nominated. If she would, then she should be asked why she would be willing to support someone she does not believe is qualified to be commander in chief.
Whatever her answer, it would tell us something we need to know: either that her doubts about Obama are so serious that she would not be willing to support the nominee of her own party, or that she would support someone she thinks is unfit to serve, or that she does not believe a word she said about Obama, and is willing to impugn a fellow Democrat's fitness to serve as President because her own interests matter more to her than her party's or the nation's.
Anger
It makes me angry. And not (just) because Clinton is mocking the aspirational in politics, which clearly exists and is an important component of getting people to follow you as a leader. It makes me angry because if Hillary becomes the nominee, she is going to have alienated a lot of young, eager, inspired voters who are currently Obama supporters.
And don't even get me started on this:
That's way over the line. As is the continued hinting that they may go to the convention and try to seat the Michigan and Florida delegations. The campaign may sleep at night thinking that they're signaling strength against the Republicans with this burn-the-place-down strategy, but what's the point in that if they've disenfranchised a large base of Democratic voters?
Maybe she still wins the presidency, maybe. But what of the down-ballot races? 2010 begins the redistricting process. Picking up state Democrats this cycle is crucial to making sure we can un-gerrymander Texas and several other states.
There's a lot that I agree with Clinton on, and clearly she's a strong candidate. But her early reliance on terrible campaign strategy has put her in a position where she believes (or is it Penn?) that she can win only by spouting the kinds of things normally reserved for campaign surrogates. And hearing that shit from her lips is nauseating me.
As of yesterday, I'm now actively hoping for Hillary to lose.
Wednesday, March 05, 2008
Terminator: Sarah Connor Chronicles
Given how ubiquitous technology is these days, I would have expected more than a Terminator version of the flux capacitor.
Tuesday, March 04, 2008
What the...
What kind of world are we leaving for our children?

