JASON: Han wasn't put in a suspended animation chamber. As Lando tells Darth Vader "Freezing him in carbonite is risky - it could kill him!" Hence, carbonite's intended use was NOT for putting people in suspended animation. Even C-3PO says that Han could be kept alive - IF - he survives the freezing process. IF!
FRENCHIE: Hmm...that's interesting and all, but we never specified what a "suspended animation chamber" was, nor did we at any point specify the need of a reason for the suspended animation.
Just to clarify, we decided that being frozen through artificial means (the example was Han Solo) was acceptable, because it left the subject in a state of suspension without killing him. Now...if being frozen had killed Han Solo (that would have been fun), then this wouldn't be up for discussion. We know he was alive, and his vitals at least were able to be checked. This lets us know that he was alive while frozen...and very much suspended.
So it counts because he was suspended artificially, and he wasn't killed by it.
PS Was Chewie hairier in the last movies then he was in the first?
UPDATE: JASON X wins the day as the most obvious miss from the list. I've updated the list with what people (well, let's be honest, what JASON) have added, and added an asterisk to the Empire entry, again courtesy Jason.
I'm trying to compile a comprehensive list of movies (and TV episodes) that feature suspended animation. Here's the list so far: MOVIES: • 2001 • Planet of the Apes (both) • Alien • Lost in Space • Rocketman • Minority Report • Judge Dredd • Demolition Man • Sleeper • Empire Strikes Back • Idiocracy • Event Horizon • Solstice • Solaris (original) • Red Planet • X Files • Batman and Robin • Austin Powers • Forever Young • Live Again, Die Again • Jason X • Strange New World TV SERIES: • Futurama • Farscape • Star Trek ("Space Seed" - the episode with Khan) • Buck Rogers • Twilight Zone episode "Quarantine" (nice catch, Kathryn) Sequels don't count (Aliens and Return of the Jedi are OUT). Neither do movies where things are frozen and come back to life when thawed (like The Thing or Brendan Fraser in Encino Man), though that may be a good follow-up list. There are no prizes and there is no reason I'm compiling this list. It just started as a conversation in Louisiana, continued tonight, and I feel like I'm missing some. So jump in in comments.
People ask me why I'm supporting Barack Obama. My friends are split between Obama and Clinton supporters (as, until fairly recently, was I). I listed some reasons back in February, but in person I usually just stick to the seventh bullet point from that post:
That the Iraq war is going to heat way up between now and November, and its renewed prominence in the campaign is going to make Obama's consistent opposition to the war a much bigger deal than it seems to be in the primary.
I always feel a little guilty saying this, because although it seems completely rational and obvious to me, I certainly don't want it to sound like I'm hoping for things to heat up so that it helps get my candidate elected.
Though I can certainly see the international appeal of an OliverStone film based on George W.'s life, I can't imagine it'll have much of a domestic run. Democrats are going to carry the psychic scars of this administration with them for a long time, and what Republican is going to go see Oliver Stone's left-slanted Bush-slamming?
Since it's being financed by a foreign sales company, presumably their model makes sense. But I won't be holding my breath for a summer 2009 release at Grauman's. Can I hear a round of "straight to HBO?"
I got back to L.A. (from LA) last night, and all of a sudden for some weird reason it's spring. Sometimes my trips are like that. Now, since I've been a kid people have been telling me I'm not the center of the universe. But if I'm not, what possible explanation could there be for a change in the weather between when I leave and when I return somewhere?
In any case, there's a particular smell in my neighborhood (Los Feliz) at night in spring. I love the smell, but every year I wonder whether it's the smell of jasmine or jacaranda. I've heard different people ascribe the same smell to both flowers. Maybe until I find out I'll start calling it "jasmaranda." Though that sounds like a genie's name.
The other thing that I love about spring (and summer) evenings in Los Angeles is that, because it's warm at night, people leave their windows open. Stepping outside into my back yard becomes the auditory equivalent of the scenes in Rear Window where Stewart is staring into the windows of all the people across from him, watching them go about their daily business. Last night, as I was bundling laundry, I could hear five or six different conversations, all set to "Picture This" off of Blondie's Parallel Lines.
By lending massive amounts to potentially insolvent institutions that it does not supervise or regulate and that may be insolvent the Fed is taking serious financial risks and seriously exacerbate moral hazard distortions. Here you have highly leveraged non bank financial institutions that made reckless investments and lending, had extremely poor risk management and altogether disregarded liquidity risks; some may be insolvent but now the Fed is providing them with a blank check for unlimited amounts. This is a most radical action and a signal of how severe the crisis of the banking system and non-bank shadow financial system is. This is the worst US financial crisis since the Great Depression and the Fed is treating it as if it was only a liquidity crisis. But this is not just a liquidity crisis; it is rather a credit and insolvency crisis.
My Macbook Pro, running Leopard, has been running for 33 days, 13 hours and 40 minutes without a restart.
I have the sense that it was only about 5 years ago that I would have to reboot my computer (hand-built XP desktop) every few days because some misbehaving background task would get a little too close to the operating system; of course, I was running professional compositing software on it, but still, it really does feel like both XP and OS X are far more stable operating environments these days than ever before. (I have no experience running Vista.)
These days, pretty much the only reason I have to reboot is because some software update requires it. (This is more true on the XP side because I have to run virus and adware software in the background.)
Cudos, Mr. Gates and Mr. Jobs (and presumably Mr. Torvalds)!
...[L]et's assume, for the sake of argument, that she actually believes that Barack Obama cannot "cross the commander-in-chief threshold." One of the most important jobs a President has is to defend the country. If she thinks that Barack Obama is not qualified to do that job, then she should not support him over anyone who can. Specifically, she should support McCain over Obama.
That's why I think some enterprising reporter should ask her whether she would support Barack Obama if he were nominated. If she would, then she should be asked why she would be willing to support someone she does not believe is qualified to be commander in chief.
Whatever her answer, it would tell us something we need to know: either that her doubts about Obama are so serious that she would not be willing to support the nominee of her own party, or that she would support someone she thinks is unfit to serve, or that she does not believe a word she said about Obama, and is willing to impugn a fellow Democrat's fitness to serve as President because her own interests matter more to her than her party's or the nation's.
For the first time in this Democratic primary, I'm actually angry at Clinton, and not just her campaign (Mark Penn) or her surrogates. Every time I see this:
It makes me angry. And not (just) because Clinton is mocking the aspirational in politics, which clearly exists and is an important component of getting people to follow you as a leader. It makes me angry because if Hillary becomes the nominee, she is going to have alienated a lot of young, eager, inspired voters who are currently Obama supporters.
And don't even get me started on this:
That's way over the line. As is the continued hinting that they may go to the convention and try to seat the Michigan and Florida delegations. The campaign may sleep at night thinking that they're signaling strength against the Republicans with this burn-the-place-down strategy, but what's the point in that if they've disenfranchised a large base of Democratic voters?
Maybe she still wins the presidency, maybe. But what of the down-ballot races? 2010 begins the redistricting process. Picking up state Democrats this cycle is crucial to making sure we can un-gerrymander Texas and several other states.
There's a lot that I agree with Clinton on, and clearly she's a strong candidate. But her early reliance on terrible campaign strategy has put her in a position where she believes (or is it Penn?) that she can win only by spouting the kinds of things normally reserved for campaign surrogates. And hearing that shit from her lips is nauseating me.
As of yesterday, I'm now actively hoping for Hillary to lose.
The frustrating thing about this show is how, on the one hand, it does a great job tapping into the paranoia associated with the creep of seemingly autonomous technology in everyday life, but on the other tries to convince us that dual-core computer technology is super plus new, or that a virus can be written for a computer program, sight unseen.
Given how ubiquitous technology is these days, I would have expected more than a Terminator version of the flux capacitor.